CBOE vs. ICE: Cboe Global Markets vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison
How do Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) are both classified in the Financial Exchanges & Data sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cboe Global Markets Inc. | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Financial Exchanges & Data | Financial Exchanges & Data |
| Market Capitalization | 36.86 billion USD | 96.27 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Cboe | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 15, 2010 | November 16, 2005 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.97% | 18.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 27.34% | 18.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 23.42% | 6.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.53% | 25.87% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.73% | -33.97% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 3.09M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.95 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.37 | 0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CBOE.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
27.39%
- Max
- 44.78%
- CBOE
- 27.39%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- CBOE
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
35.29%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- CBOE
- 35.29%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.39% | 14.40% |
| ROA (TTM) | 11.84% | 2.28% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 28.05% | 38.14% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 35.29% | 52.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.13% | 7.47% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.00% | 9.47% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 44.52% | 20.71% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 68.19% | 30.77% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- CBOE
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
21.49%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- CBOE
- 21.49%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.86% | 1.17% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 21.49% | 27.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
25.14
- Max
- 45.85
- CBOE
- 25.14
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
6.98
- Max
- 9.23
- CBOE
- 6.98
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
6.22
- Max
- 7.79
- CBOE
- 6.22
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.14 | 23.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 6.98 | 8.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.22 | 3.22 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |