CBOE vs. IBKR: Cboe Global Markets vs. Interactive Brokers Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CBOE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while IBKR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) has an aggressive beta of 1.37, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 23.67% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 16.68% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 77.70% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 9.73% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.14% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 0.46% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 12.79% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.94 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

Both look expensive on sales: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 18.30 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 5.53 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics