CBOE vs. FDS: Cboe Global Markets vs. FactSet Research Systems Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) are both classified in the Financial Exchanges & Data sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 25.48% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 21.54% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.22% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 6.65% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at -6.30% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 1.33% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 31.02% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.50 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 4.67 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 and FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 5.77 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics