CBOE vs. CG: Cboe Global Markets vs. Carlyle Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Carlyle (CG) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CBOE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while CG falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Carlyle (CG) has an aggressive beta of 1.82, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Carlyle (CG) at 5.23% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CBOE.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and Carlyle (CG) at 12.81% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 35.29%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% and Carlyle (CG) at 3.50% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 21.49%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 and Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 and Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics