CARR vs. MMM: Carrier Global vs. 3M Stock Comparison
How do Carrier Global (CARR) and 3M (MMM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carrier Global (CARR) and 3M (MMM) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CARR is classified in Building Products while MMM is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.
3M (MMM) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 2, 1962, whereas Carrier Global (CARR) listed on March 19, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carrier Global Corp. | 3M Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Industrial Conglomerates |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Industrial Conglomerates |
| Market Capitalization | 42.86 billion USD | 95.67 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 19, 2020 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -4.90% | 16.26% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 3.62% | 38.64% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 1.11% | 8.14% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.35% | 27.61% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.97 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -39.75% | -48.86% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.08M | 3.14M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.36 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative ROE of -13.44%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile 3M (MMM) reports 72.97%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
-13.44%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- CARR
- -13.44%
- Min
- -17.12%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
72.97%
- MMM
- 72.97%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative net margin of -7.90%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile 3M (MMM) reports 14.01%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
-7.90%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- CARR
- -7.90%
- Min
- -12.89%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
14.01%
- Max
- 27.47%
- MMM
- 14.01%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Carrier Global (CARR) at 11.00%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
11.00%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- CARR
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.69%
- Max
- 36.60%
- MMM
- 23.69%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -13.44% | 72.97% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.43% | 8.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -7.90% | 14.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.00% | 23.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 24.38% | 39.53% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Carrier Global (CARR) at -3.29% and 3M (MMM) at 1.52% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
3M (MMM) at -20.53% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carrier Global (CARR) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.29% | 1.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.95% | -1.57% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -72.03% | -20.53% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -25.14% | -16.16% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.00 and 3M (MMM) at 1.41 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CARR
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.36
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- MMM
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but MMM is more stretched: Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.14 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and 3M (MMM) at 3.04 is above its industry benchmark range.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.14
- Max
- 2.33
- CARR
- 1.14
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.04
- MMM
- 3.04
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.14 | 3.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.24 | 1.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.80% and 3M (MMM) at 1.64% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.80%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CARR
- 1.80%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 2.66%
- MMM
- 1.64%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Carrier Global (CARR) at 67.39% and 3M (MMM) at 45.82% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
67.39%
- CARR
- 67.39%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
45.82%
- Max
- 67.39%
- MMM
- 45.82%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 1.64% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 67.39% | 45.82% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: 3M (MMM) trades at 27.63 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Carrier Global (CARR) has no P/E ratio this period.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
- CARR
- --
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
27.63
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MMM
- 27.63
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.88 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.79 sits in the pricier quartile — MMM costs more per dollar of sales.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.88
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CARR
- 1.88
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.79
- Max
- 7.54
- MMM
- 3.79
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Carrier Global (CARR) at 4.27 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 23.18 prices above its benchmark range — MMM looks rich relative to book.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
4.27
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CARR
- 4.27
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.18
- MMM
- 23.18
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CARR | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 27.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.88 | 3.79 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.27 | 23.18 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.54% | 6.66% |