CARR vs. IR: Carrier Global vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do Carrier Global (CARR) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carrier Global (CARR) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CARR is classified in Building Products while IR is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carrier Global Corp. | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 42.86 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 19, 2020 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -4.90% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 3.62% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 1.11% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.35% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -39.75% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.08M | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.36 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative ROE of -13.44%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports 13.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
-13.44%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- CARR
- -13.44%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative net margin of -7.90%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports 17.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
-7.90%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- CARR
- -7.90%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Carrier Global (CARR) at 11.00%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
11.00%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- CARR
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -13.44% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.43% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -7.90% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.00% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 24.38% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carrier Global (CARR) at -3.29% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Carrier Global (CARR) at -72.03% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.29% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.95% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -72.03% | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -25.14% | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.00 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CARR.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CARR
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.14 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.14
- Max
- 2.33
- CARR
- 1.14
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.14 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.24 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.80% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CARR the richer one.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.80%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CARR
- 1.80%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 67.39% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
67.39%
- CARR
- 67.39%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 67.39% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Ingersoll Rand (IR) trades at 23.51 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Carrier Global (CARR) has no P/E ratio this period.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
- CARR
- --
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.88 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.88
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CARR
- 1.88
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Carrier Global (CARR) at 4.27 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
4.27
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CARR
- 4.27
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CARR | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.88 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.27 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.54% | 3.19% |