CARR vs. GWW: Carrier Global vs. W.W. Grainger Stock Comparison
How do Carrier Global (CARR) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carrier Global (CARR) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CARR is classified in Building Products while GWW is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.
W.W. Grainger (GWW) has more than two decades of public-market history since February 21, 1973, whereas Carrier Global (CARR) listed on March 19, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carrier Global Corp. | W.W. Grainger Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| Market Capitalization | 42.86 billion USD | 67.45 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 19, 2020 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -4.90% | 54.07% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 3.62% | 24.16% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 1.11% | 25.95% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.35% | 24.49% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.93 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -39.75% | -24.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.08M | 250.35K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | 2.03 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.36 | 3.31 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative ROE of -13.44%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile W.W. Grainger (GWW) reports 52.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
-13.44%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- CARR
- -13.44%
- Min
- -17.12%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
52.33%
- GWW
- 52.33%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative net margin of -7.90%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile W.W. Grainger (GWW) reports 11.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
-7.90%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- CARR
- -7.90%
- Min
- -12.89%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
11.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- GWW
- 11.17%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Carrier Global (CARR) at 11.00% and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 16.14% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
11.00%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- CARR
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
16.14%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- GWW
- 16.14%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -13.44% | 52.33% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.43% | 20.34% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -7.90% | 11.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.00% | 16.14% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 24.38% | 39.43% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 4.51% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carrier Global (CARR) at -3.29% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at -8.55% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carrier Global (CARR) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.29% | 4.51% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.95% | 5.62% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -72.03% | -8.55% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -25.14% | 5.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.00 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CARR.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CARR
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.36
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
2.61
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GWW
- 2.61
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.14 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.14
- Max
- 2.33
- CARR
- 1.14
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- GWW
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 2.61 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.14 | 0.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.24 | 0.69 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.80% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CARR the richer one.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.80%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CARR
- 1.80%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- GWW
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 20.87% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 67.39% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
67.39%
- CARR
- 67.39%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
20.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- GWW
- 20.87%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 67.39% | 20.87% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: W.W. Grainger (GWW) trades at 31.66 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Carrier Global (CARR) has no P/E ratio this period.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
- CARR
- --
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- GWW
- 31.66
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.88 and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 3.48 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
1.88
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CARR
- 1.88
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
3.48
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- GWW
- 3.48
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Carrier Global (CARR) at 4.27 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 15.56 prices above its benchmark range — GWW looks rich relative to book.
CARR
Capital Goods industry group
4.27
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CARR
- 4.27
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
15.56
- GWW
- 15.56
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.88 | 3.48 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.27 | 15.56 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.54% | 1.97% |