CARR vs. FIX: Carrier Global vs. Comfort Systems USA Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CARR is classified in Building Products while FIX is classified in Construction & Engineering.

Comfort Systems USA (FIX) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 27, 1997, whereas Carrier Global (CARR) listed on March 19, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Profile Item	CARR	FIX
Name	Carrier Global Corp.	Comfort Systems USA Inc.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Construction & Engineering
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	42.86 billion USD	35.81 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 19, 2020	June 27, 1997
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CARR

FIX

GSPC

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
Total Return (1Y)	-4.90%	15.31%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	3.62%	81.62%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	1.11%	62.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CARR

FIX

GSPC

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	35.35%	60.97%
Beta (5Y)	1.32	1.68
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-39.75%	-53.28%
Avg. Volume (3M)	6.08M	471.64K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CARR and FIX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.26	0.18
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.36	0.25

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative ROE of -13.44%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Comfort Systems USA (FIX) reports 58.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

-13.44%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
CARR: -13.44%
Min: -17.12%

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

58.61%

FIX: 58.61%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Carrier Global (CARR) reports a negative net margin of -7.90%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Comfort Systems USA (FIX) reports 13.01%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

-7.90%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
CARR: -7.90%
Min: -12.89%

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

13.01%

Max: 27.47%
FIX: 13.01%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Carrier Global (CARR) at 11.00% and Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 16.47% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

11.00%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
CARR: 11.00%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

16.47%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
FIX: 16.47%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
ROE (TTM)	-13.44%	58.61%
ROA (TTM)	3.43%	16.88%
Net Margin (TTM)	-7.90%	13.01%
Operating Margin (TTM)	11.00%	16.47%
Gross Margin (TTM)	24.38%	25.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 29.52% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Carrier Global (CARR) at -3.29% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 97.81% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Carrier Global (CARR) at -72.03% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-3.29%	29.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	7.95%	30.03%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-72.03%	97.81%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-25.14%	61.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.00 and Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 1.15 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

1.00

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
CARR: 1.00
Min: 0.36

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

1.15

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FIX: 1.15
Min: 0.36

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 0.11 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.14 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

1.14

Max: 2.33
CARR: 1.14
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

0.11

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
FIX: 0.11
Min: 0.00

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.00	1.15
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.14	0.11
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.24	-0.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.80% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 0.31% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CARR the richer one.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

1.80%

Max: 2.66%
CARR: 1.80%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

0.31%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FIX: 0.31%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 6.48% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Carrier Global (CARR) at 67.39% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

67.39%

CARR: 67.39%
Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

6.48%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
FIX: 6.48%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.80%	0.31%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	67.39%	6.48%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Comfort Systems USA (FIX) trades at 21.98 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Carrier Global (CARR) has no P/E ratio this period.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03
CARR: --

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

21.98

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
FIX: 21.98
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): CARR does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; FIX is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Carrier Global (CARR) at 1.88 and Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 2.85 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

1.88

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
CARR: 1.88
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

2.85

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
FIX: 2.85
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Carrier Global (CARR) at 4.27 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Comfort Systems USA (FIX) at 10.66 prices above its benchmark range — FIX looks rich relative to book.

CARR

Capital Goods industry group

4.27

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
CARR: 4.27
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

FIX

Capital Goods industry group

10.66

FIX: 10.66
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Carrier Global (CARR) vs. Comfort Systems USA (FIX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carrier Global (CARR) and Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
Metric	CARR	FIX
P/E Ratio (TTM)	--	21.98
P/S Ratio (TTM)	1.88	2.85
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.27	10.66
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.54%	5.94%