Seek Returns

CAH vs. SNN: Cardinal Health vs. Smith & Nephew Stock Comparison

How do Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but CAH is classified in Health Care Providers & Services while SNN is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies.

Cardinal Health (CAH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Smith & Nephew (SNN) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
Profile ItemCAHSNN
NameCardinal Health, Inc.Smith & Nephew plc Sponsored ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS Industry GroupHealth Care Equipment & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryHealth Care DistributorsHealth Care Equipment
Market Capitalization62.80 billion USD13.04 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 4, 1983November 16, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CAH
SNN
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
Total Return (1Y)35.44%-4.20%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)40.52%11.34%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)43.73%-0.34%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CAH
SNN
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)25.91%27.31%
Beta (5Y)0.490.49
Max Drawdown (5Y)-20.95%-38.80%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.77M1.49M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CAH and SNN are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.20-0.31
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.90-0.46

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Smith & Nephew (SNN) earns 11.85% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Cardinal Health (CAH) has no ROE this period.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
CAH
--

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

11.85%

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
SNN
11.85%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): CAH does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; SNN is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 10.08% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.71%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.71%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
Median
2.18%
CAH
0.71%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

10.08%

Max
29.35%
SNN
10.08%
Q3
9.33%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their net margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 14.47% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cardinal Health (CAH) at 1.34%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.34%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
CAH
1.34%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

14.47%

Max
35.43%
SNN
14.47%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their operating margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
ROE (TTM)--11.85%
ROA (TTM)3.72%5.16%
Net Margin (TTM)0.71%10.08%
Operating Margin (TTM)1.34%14.47%
Gross Margin (TTM)3.90%68.44%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 14.23% and Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 6.09% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 52.34% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Cardinal Health (CAH) at 12.09% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SNN.

Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
Revenue Growth (YoY)14.23%6.09%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.44%5.73%
EPS Growth (YoY)12.09%52.34%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)93.37%42.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 2.14 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.89 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CAH.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.89

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
CAH
0.89
Min
0.30

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.14

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
SNN
2.14
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their current ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Smith & Nephew (SNN) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.73 against its industry range, while Cardinal Health (CAH) reports no figure this period.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
CAH
--

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.73

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
SNN
0.73
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): CAH does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; SNN is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.892.14
Debt / Equity (MRQ)--0.73
Net Debt / EBITDA0.812.19

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.77% and Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 1.24% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.77%

CAH
0.77%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.24%

SNN
1.24%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 26.56% and Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 53.20% pay out more of their earnings than any of their industry peers — the thinnest cover in their groups, so dividend headroom deserves attention.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

26.56%

CAH
26.56%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

53.20%

SNN
53.20%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.77%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.56%53.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 35.15 and Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 21.19 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

35.15

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
CAH
35.15
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

21.19

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
SNN
21.19
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.24 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 2.07 prices around its industry’s middle — CAH costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.24

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
Q1
1.10
CAH
0.24
Min
0.03

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.07

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
SNN
2.07
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Cardinal Health (CAH) reports a negative P/B ratio of -20.84, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Smith & Nephew (SNN) reports 12.80, ranking against industry peers normally.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

-20.84

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
CAH
-20.84

SNN

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

12.80

SNN
12.80
Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Smith & Nephew (SNN): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Smith & Nephew (SNN)
MetricCAHSNN
P/E Ratio (TTM)35.1521.19
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.242.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)-20.8412.80
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.99%8.12%