Seek Returns

CAH vs. PHG: Cardinal Health vs. Koninklijke Philips Stock Comparison

How do Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but CAH is classified in Health Care Providers & Services while PHG is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies.

Cardinal Health (CAH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
Profile ItemCAHPHG
NameCardinal Health, Inc.Koninklijke Philips N.V. ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS Industry GroupHealth Care Equipment & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryHealth Care DistributorsHealth Care Equipment
Market Capitalization62.80 billion USD29.67 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 4, 1983March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CAH
PHG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
Total Return (1Y)35.44%13.15%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)40.52%18.95%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)43.73%-6.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CAH
PHG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)25.91%29.55%
Beta (5Y)0.490.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-20.95%-74.51%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.77M1.08M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CAH and PHG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.200.30
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.900.48

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) earns 8.61% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Cardinal Health (CAH) has no ROE this period.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
CAH
--

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

8.61%

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
PHG
8.61%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): CAH does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; PHG is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.71% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.71%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
Median
2.18%
CAH
0.71%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

5.39%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
PHG
5.39%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their net margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 1.34% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.34%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
CAH
1.34%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

3.76%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
PHG
3.76%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
ROE (TTM)--8.61%
ROA (TTM)3.72%3.59%
Net Margin (TTM)0.71%5.39%
Operating Margin (TTM)1.34%3.76%
Gross Margin (TTM)3.90%46.43%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cardinal Health (CAH) at 14.23% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Cardinal Health (CAH) reports EPS growth of 12.09%, ranked against its industry; Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
Revenue Growth (YoY)14.23%-1.04%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.44%0.01%
EPS Growth (YoY)12.09%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)93.37%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.89 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.89

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
CAH
0.89
Min
0.30

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.33

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
PHG
1.33
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.70 against its industry range, while Cardinal Health (CAH) reports no figure this period.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
CAH
--

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.70

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
PHG
0.70
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): CAH does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; PHG is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.891.33
Debt / Equity (MRQ)--0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA0.812.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cardinal Health (CAH) reports a yield of 0.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.77%

CAH
0.77%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

PHG
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Cardinal Health (CAH) reports 26.56%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

26.56%

CAH
26.56%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

211.79%

PHG
211.79%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.77%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.56%211.79%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Cardinal Health (CAH) at 35.15 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — PHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

35.15

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
CAH
35.15
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

63.23

Max
80.41
PHG
63.23
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.24 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 prices around its industry’s middle — CAH costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.24

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
Q1
1.10
CAH
0.24
Min
0.03

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.67

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
PHG
1.67
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Cardinal Health (CAH) reports a negative P/B ratio of -20.84, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports 2.28, ranking against industry peers normally.

CAH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

-20.84

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
CAH
-20.84

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.28

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
PHG
2.28
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
Loading chart…
Cardinal Health (CAH) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cardinal Health (CAH) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCAHPHG
P/E Ratio (TTM)35.1563.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.241.67
P/B Ratio (MRQ)-20.842.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.99%6.23%