BX vs. SCHW: Blackstone vs. Charles Schwab Stock Comparison
How do Blackstone (BX) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Blackstone (BX) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BX is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while SCHW falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Profile Item | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Blackstone Inc. | The Charles Schwab Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Asset Management & Custody Banks | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 148.61 billion USD | 158.22 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 22, 2007 | September 22, 1987 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -11.29% | -0.80% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 12.22% | 21.35% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 0.26% | 4.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.63% | 26.01% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.50 | 0.74 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.29% | -49.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.75M | 8.22M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.40 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.57 | -0.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Blackstone (BX) at 32.38% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.12% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BX.
BX
Financial Services industry group
32.38%
- Max
- 44.78%
- BX
- 32.38%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
21.12%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- SCHW
- 21.12%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 39.33% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Blackstone (BX) at 22.99%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BX
Financial Services industry group
22.99%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- BX
- 22.99%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
39.33%
- Max
- 62.84%
- SCHW
- 39.33%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Blackstone (BX) at 48.86% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 52.67% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BX
Financial Services industry group
48.86%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- BX
- 48.86%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
52.67%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- SCHW
- 52.67%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 32.38% | 21.12% |
| ROA (TTM) | 14.27% | 2.16% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 22.99% | 39.33% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 48.86% | 52.67% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Blackstone (BX) at 13.54% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 22.01% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 55.52% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Blackstone (BX) at 6.91% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SCHW.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 13.54% | 22.01% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 20.27% | 4.83% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 6.91% | 55.52% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.92% | 9.93% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Blackstone (BX) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Blackstone (BX) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Blackstone (BX) at 4.22% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 1.33% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BX the richer one.
BX
Financial Services industry group
4.22%
- Max
- 9.77%
- BX
- 4.22%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
1.33%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- SCHW
- 1.33%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Blackstone (BX) reports payout ratio above 100% at 111.19%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Charles Schwab (SCHW) reports 21.03%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BX
Financial Services industry group
111.19%
- Max
- 241.07%
- BX
- 111.19%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
21.03%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- SCHW
- 21.03%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.22% | 1.33% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 111.19% | 21.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 15.64 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blackstone (BX) at 26.61 sits in the richer quartile — BX needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
BX
Financial Services industry group
26.61
- Max
- 45.85
- BX
- 26.61
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
15.64
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- SCHW
- 15.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 5.85 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Blackstone (BX) at 9.61 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BX
Financial Services industry group
9.61
- BX
- 9.61
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
5.85
- Max
- 9.23
- SCHW
- 5.85
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 3.08 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Blackstone (BX) at 10.81 prices above its benchmark range — BX looks rich relative to book.
BX
Financial Services industry group
10.81
- BX
- 10.81
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
3.08
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- SCHW
- 3.08
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BX | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 26.61 | 15.64 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 9.61 | 5.85 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 10.81 | 3.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |