Seek Returns

BUD vs. MNST: Anheuser-Busch InBev vs. Monster Beverage Stock Comparison

How do Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST) both belong to the Beverages industry, though BUD is classified under Brewers while MNST falls under Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages.

Monster Beverage (MNST) trades as ordinary local shares, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
Profile ItemBUDMNST
NameAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV Sponsored ADRMonster Beverage Corporation
Country/RegionBelgiumUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupFood, Beverage & TobaccoFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
GICS Sub-IndustryBrewersSoft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages
Market Capitalization154.04 billion USD85.02 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateJuly 1, 2009December 9, 1985
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BUD
MNST
GSPC
Loading price history…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
Total Return (1Y)34.54%36.05%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)12.84%15.20%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)7.87%12.60%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BUD
MNST
GSPC
Loading price history…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)23.36%26.60%
Beta (5Y)0.570.49
Max Drawdown (5Y)-33.13%-26.03%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.16M11.06M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BUD and MNST are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.301.20
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.031.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 25.70% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 11.39% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MNST.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

11.39%

Max
34.02%
Q3
17.19%
BUD
11.39%
Median
10.87%
Q1
3.66%
Min
-16.01%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

25.70%

Max
34.02%
MNST
25.70%
Q3
17.19%
Median
10.87%
Q1
3.66%
Min
-16.01%
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their ROE against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 14.90% and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 23.08% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

14.90%

Max
25.56%
BUD
14.90%
Q3
11.22%
Median
4.88%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-13.81%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

23.08%

Max
25.56%
MNST
23.08%
Q3
11.22%
Median
4.88%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-13.81%
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their net margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 27.34% and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 29.18% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

27.34%

Max
35.93%
BUD
27.34%
Q3
17.10%
Median
11.06%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-11.04%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

29.18%

Max
35.93%
MNST
29.18%
Q3
17.10%
Median
11.06%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-11.04%
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their operating margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
ROE (TTM)11.39%25.70%
ROA (TTM)4.88%17.48%
Net Margin (TTM)14.90%23.08%
Operating Margin (TTM)27.34%29.18%
Gross Margin (TTM)56.49%55.55%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at -0.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MNST.

Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 16.10% and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 19.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.75%10.70%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)0.88%9.54%
EPS Growth (YoY)16.10%19.75%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)5.22%20.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.73 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 0.66 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.66

Max
4.39
Q3
2.48
Median
1.53
Q1
1.00
BUD
0.66
Min
0.43

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.73

Max
4.39
MNST
3.73
Q3
2.48
Median
1.53
Q1
1.00
Min
0.43
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their current ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 0.72 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.72

Max
2.21
Q3
1.13
BUD
0.72
Median
0.71
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.01

Max
2.21
Q3
1.13
Median
0.71
Q1
0.31
MNST
0.01
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.663.73
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.720.01
Net Debt / EBITDA3.28-1.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) reports a yield of 1.51%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.51%

Max
7.92%
Q3
3.79%
Median
2.21%
BUD
1.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
7.92%
Q3
3.79%
Median
2.21%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) reports a payout of 29.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

29.00%

Max
188.31%
Q3
81.68%
Median
46.29%
BUD
29.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
188.31%
Q3
81.68%
Median
46.29%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.51%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.00%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 16.86 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 39.82 sits in the richer quartile — MNST needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

16.86

Max
44.14
Q3
30.71
Median
17.94
BUD
16.86
Q1
13.85
Min
6.36

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

39.82

Max
44.14
MNST
39.82
Q3
30.71
Median
17.94
Q1
13.85
Min
6.36
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on sales: Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 2.46 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.22 prices even higher, above its industry range.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

2.46

Max
4.61
BUD
2.46
Q3
2.16
Median
1.01
Q1
0.52
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.22

MNST
9.22
Max
4.61
Q3
2.16
Median
1.01
Q1
0.52
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 9.88 and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.08 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

BUD

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.88

BUD
9.88
Max
5.75
Q3
3.08
Median
1.74
Q1
0.98
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.08

MNST
9.08
Max
5.75
Q3
3.08
Median
1.74
Q1
0.98
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBUDMNST
P/E Ratio (TTM)16.8639.82
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.469.22
P/B Ratio (MRQ)9.889.08
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)6.94%1.98%