BUD vs. MICC: Anheuser-Busch InBev vs. Magnum Ice Cream Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but BUD is classified in Beverages while MICC is classified in Food Products.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has been public since July 1, 2009 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) only listed on December 8, 2025 — long-window metrics on the MICC side should be interpreted with caution.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both BUD and MICC need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) earns 9.64% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has no ROE this period.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 15.42% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 2.24%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 27.48% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 12.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at -0.75% and Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -0.47% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 16.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -49.24% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Short-term liquidity can only be read on one side of this pairing: Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) shows current ratio of 1.01 against its industry benchmark, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has no reading this period.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 0.72 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 3.43 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) reports a yield of 1.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) reports a payout of 27.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 17.07 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 39.67 sits in the richer quartile — MICC needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.45 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 2.58 sits in the pricier quartile — BUD costs more per dollar of sales.

Measured against book value, both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 10.60 and Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.80 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics