BUD vs. GIS: Anheuser-Busch InBev vs. General Mills Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) and General Mills (GIS) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but BUD is classified in Beverages while GIS is classified in Food Products.

General Mills (GIS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative beta of -0.01, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has a non-negative beta of 0.51.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has no ROE value reported for this period; General Mills (GIS) reports a negative figure of -10.50%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative net margin of -4.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) reports 15.42%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 27.48% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of General Mills (GIS) at 15.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at -0.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while General Mills (GIS) at -5.45% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 16.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while General Mills (GIS) at -103.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Short-term liquidity can only be read on one side of this pairing: General Mills (GIS) shows current ratio of 0.70 against its industry benchmark, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has no reading this period.

Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 0.72 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while General Mills (GIS) at 1.82 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

General Mills (GIS) at 6.69% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 1.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, GIS the richer one.

Both Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 27.35% and General Mills (GIS) at 59.41% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) trades at 17.07 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while General Mills (GIS) has no P/E ratio this period.

General Mills (GIS) at 1.04 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 2.58 sits in the pricier quartile — BUD costs more per dollar of sales.

General Mills (GIS) at 2.55 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) at 10.60 prices above its benchmark range — BUD looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics