Seek Returns logo

BUD vs. GIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BUD and GIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BUD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, GIS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBUDGIS
Company NameAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NVGeneral Mills, Inc.
CountryBelgiumUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesFood Products
Market Capitalization123.07 billion USD26.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 2009March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BUD and GIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BUD vs. GIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBUDGIS
5-Day Price Return1.64%-0.06%
13-Week Price Return-12.05%-9.47%
26-Week Price Return5.28%-16.63%
52-Week Price Return-3.15%-28.90%
Month-to-Date Return3.93%1.35%
Year-to-Date Return10.72%-22.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.21M5.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.73M5.29M
3-Month Volatility27.93%20.77%
Beta0.89-0.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BUD

3.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

BUD’s Return on Equity of 3.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GIS

24.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

In the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s Return on Equity of 24.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BUD

12.16%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

BUD’s Net Profit Margin of 12.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GIS

11.78%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.78% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BUD

27.17%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.17% places BUD in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GIS

16.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.96% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBUDGIS
Return on Equity (TTM)3.64%24.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.39%7.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.16%11.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.17%16.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.70%34.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BUD

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

BUD’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIS

0.67

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BUD

0.94

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

BUD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIS

1.62

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BUD

3.55

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, BUD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.55 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBUDGIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.640.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.450.37
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.941.62
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.556.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

BUD vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BUD vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BUD

2.98%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

BUD’s Dividend Yield of 2.98% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIS

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.96%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BUD

126.97%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

BUD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 126.97% is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GIS

58.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.33% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBUDGIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.98%4.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)126.97%58.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BUD

17.36

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

BUD’s P/E Ratio of 17.36 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GIS

11.77

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 11.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BUD

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

BUD’s P/S Ratio of 2.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GIS

1.39

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BUD

1.50

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

BUD’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GIS

3.18

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BUD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBUDGIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.3611.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.111.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.503.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.5911.78