BTSG vs. UHS: BrightSpring Health Services vs. Universal Health Services Stock Comparison

Company Profile

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) and Universal Health Services (UHS) both belong to the Health Care Providers & Services industry, though BTSG is classified under Health Care Services while UHS falls under Health Care Facilities.

Universal Health Services (UHS) carries decades of public-market history since July 9, 1981, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) listed on January 26, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the UHS side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 15.54% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 19.74% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 2.69% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 7.97% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 3.81% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.60% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 28.18% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.71% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BTSG.

Only one side can be read here: Universal Health Services (UHS) reports EPS growth of 37.34%, ranked against its industry; BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 1.62 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.37 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.80 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 1.09 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Universal Health Services (UHS) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Universal Health Services (UHS) reports a payout of 3.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 8.18 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 47.62 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for UHS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 0.88 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.63 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.51 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 6.39 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics