BTSG vs. PHG: BrightSpring Health Services vs. Koninklijke Philips Stock Comparison

Company Profile

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but BTSG is classified in Health Care Providers & Services while PHG is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) carries decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) listed on January 26, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the PHG side.

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) has an aggressive beta of 1.75, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is defensive at 0.65 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 15.54% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 8.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BTSG.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 2.69% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 3.81% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 28.18% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) nor Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 1.62 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PHG.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 0.70 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 1.09 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) nor Koninklijke Philips (PHG) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 47.62 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — PHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 prices around its industry’s middle — BTSG costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 2.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 6.39 carries an above-peer premium to book — BTSG is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics