BTSG vs. CAH: BrightSpring Health Services vs. Cardinal Health Stock Comparison

Company Profile

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) and Cardinal Health (CAH) both belong to the Health Care Providers & Services industry, though BTSG is classified under Health Care Services while CAH falls under Health Care Distributors.

Cardinal Health (CAH) carries decades of public-market history since August 4, 1983, while BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) listed on January 26, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the CAH side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) has an aggressive beta of 1.75, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cardinal Health (CAH) is defensive at 0.49 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) earns 15.54% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Cardinal Health (CAH) has no ROE this period.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 2.69% and Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.71% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 3.81% and Cardinal Health (CAH) at 1.34% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 28.18% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cardinal Health (CAH) at 14.23% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BTSG.

Only one side can be read here: Cardinal Health (CAH) reports EPS growth of 12.09%, ranked against its industry; BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 1.62 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.89 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CAH.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.09 against its industry range, while Cardinal Health (CAH) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cardinal Health (CAH) reports a yield of 0.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cardinal Health (CAH) reports a payout of 26.56%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 47.62 and Cardinal Health (CAH) at 35.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Both BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) at 0.88 and Cardinal Health (CAH) at 0.24 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Cardinal Health (CAH) reports a negative P/B ratio of -20.84, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile BrightSpring Health Services (BTSG) reports 6.39, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics