BSAC vs. CM: Banco Santander-Chile vs. Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 23.31% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.58% also sits in the top quartile.

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 47.19% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 33.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 9.86% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 13.66% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 22.86% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 17.72% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) reports a yield of 3.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 40.12% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 57.73% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 12.48 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.32 sits in the richer quartile — CM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 1.33 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 2.24 carries an above-peer premium to book — CM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics