BRK.B vs. MU: Berkshire Hathaway vs. Micron Technology Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) is classified in the Financials sector (Financial Services), whereas Micron Technology (MU) belongs to Information Technology (Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment) — their GICS classifications point to very different parts of the market.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Micron Technology (MU) has a highly aggressive beta of 2.17, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) is defensive at 0.62 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Micron Technology (MU) at 66.64% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at 10.50%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Micron Technology (MU) at 55.91% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at 19.31%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Micron Technology (MU) at 80.37% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at 14.35% operates around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Micron Technology (MU) at 48.85% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at -3.23% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Micron Technology (MU) at 984.29% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at -24.78%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Micron Technology (MU) shows current ratio of 3.43; Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) doesn’t get one — Financial Services balance sheets aren’t split into current and non-current buckets, so short-term liquidity there is judged through regulatory measures instead.

Micron Technology (MU) shows debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06; for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) the ratio is set aside — in Financial Services, balance-sheet leverage is part of the business model itself, so capital-adequacy measures do the job this ratio does elsewhere.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Micron Technology (MU) reports a yield of 0.06%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Micron Technology (MU) reports a payout of 1.12%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Micron Technology (MU) at 19.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at 14.62 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MU, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

On P/S ratio, both Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at 2.81 and Micron Technology (MU) at 12.15 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) at 0.00 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Micron Technology (MU) at 10.88 is valued near its industry’s middle — BRK.B is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics