Seek Returns logo

BP vs. FANG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BP and FANG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, FANG is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBPFANG
Company NameBP p.l.c.Diamondback Energy, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization88.12 billion USD39.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 12, 2012
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BP and FANG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BP vs. FANG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBPFANG
5-Day Price Return0.51%-2.06%
13-Week Price Return15.05%-1.06%
26-Week Price Return-10.29%-11.72%
52-Week Price Return-2.18%-29.60%
Month-to-Date Return3.89%-7.26%
Year-to-Date Return7.00%-15.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume31.78M1.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume46.13M2.25M
3-Month Volatility23.93%30.23%
Beta0.011.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BP

0.93%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

BP’s Return on Equity of 0.93% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FANG

10.06%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

FANG’s Return on Equity of 10.06% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BP

0.30%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, BP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.30% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FANG

27.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.25% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BP

3.72%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

BP’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.72% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FANG

35.43%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.43% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBPFANG
Return on Equity (TTM)0.93%10.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.20%5.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.30%27.25%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.72%35.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.49%70.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BP

1.21

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

BP’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FANG

0.55

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

FANG’s Current Ratio of 0.55 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BP

1.27

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

BP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FANG

0.39

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FANG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BP

78.95

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 78.95, BP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FANG

12.06

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

FANG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBPFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.210.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.270.39
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)78.9512.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

BP vs. FANG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BP vs. FANG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BP

5.78%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

BP’s Dividend Yield of 5.78% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FANG

3.13%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Yield of 3.13% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BP

150.36%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

BP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 150.36% is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FANG

32.81%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.81% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBPFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.78%3.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)150.36%32.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BP

155.98

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 155.98, BP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FANG

10.48

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

FANG’s P/E Ratio of 10.48 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BP

0.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, BP’s P/S Ratio of 0.47 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FANG

2.86

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FANG’s P/S Ratio of 2.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BP

1.33

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

BP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FANG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

FANG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BP vs. FANG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBPFANG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)155.9810.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.472.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.331.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.6420.25