BN vs. FUTU: Brookfield vs. Futu Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield (BN) and Futu (FUTU) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while FUTU falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Brookfield (BN) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Brookfield (BN) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Brookfield (BN) at 2.26% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Brookfield (BN) at 1.77% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Brookfield (BN) at 25.67%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Brookfield (BN) at -12.68% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Both Brookfield (BN) at 137.06% and Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield (BN) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield (BN) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Brookfield (BN) reports a yield of 0.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Brookfield (BN) at 48.15% and Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Brookfield (BN) at 76.63 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BN’s trailing earnings.

Both Brookfield (BN) at 1.14 and Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

On P/B ratio, both Brookfield (BN) at 2.18 and Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics