BLDR vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BLDR	LUV
Company Name	Builders FirstSource, Inc.	Southwest Airlines Co.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Passenger Airlines
Market Capitalization	14.68 billion USD	16.38 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 28, 2005	January 2, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	LUV
5-Day Price Return	-4.33%	1.56%
13-Week Price Return	14.51%	-4.33%
26-Week Price Return	-8.36%	4.18%
52-Week Price Return	-14.26%	16.65%
Month-to-Date Return	8.67%	0.81%
Year-to-Date Return	-3.34%	-7.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.94M	7.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.14M	11.72M
3-Month Volatility	48.27%	40.41%
Beta	1.67	1.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 28.15%
Median: 15.41%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: -11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 17.65%
Q3: 8.90%
Median: 5.80%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: -3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.33%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.43%
Min: -2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	LUV
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.49%	4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.82%	1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.74%	1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.70%	1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	31.58%	73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.76
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 9.80
Q3: 4.82
Median: 1.30
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 16.29
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	LUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	0.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	0.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	0.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.68	9.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LUV

2.58%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 6.71%
Q3: 3.95%
Median: 1.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.58% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 71.59%
Q3: 38.54%
Median: 8.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	LUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.15

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.15 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV

42.24

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 13.29
Q3: 11.94
Median: 8.78
Q1: 7.42
Min: 3.07

At 42.24, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.96

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LUV

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.74
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.44
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.84
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BLDR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	LUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.15	42.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.96	0.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.09	2.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	12.82	44.16