BKR vs. PBA: Baker Hughes vs. Pembina Pipeline Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while PBA is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | Pembina Pipeline Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 28.08 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | October 6, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 35.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 20.26% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 12.46% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 20.43% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.59 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -27.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 993.87K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 2.32 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PBA
Energy industry group
12.10%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- PBA
- 12.10%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PBA
Energy industry group
24.78%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PBA
- 24.78%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PBA
Energy industry group
32.63%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PBA
- 32.63%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 12.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 4.65% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 24.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 32.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 38.23% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | 5.34% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -12.50% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | -11.33% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -19.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PBA.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PBA
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PBA
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
0.80
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- PBA
- 0.80
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 0.75 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 3.74 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
6.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- PBA
- 6.13%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
86.79%
- Max
- 133.24%
- PBA
- 86.79%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 6.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 86.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PBA
Energy industry group
20.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- PBA
- 20.12
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 sits in the pricier quartile — PBA costs more per dollar of sales.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 5.40
- PBA
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — PBA is pricier on assets.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PBA
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- PBA
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 20.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 3.36 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 2.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 5.53% |