BKR vs. LNG: Baker Hughes vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while LNG is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | Cheniere Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 56.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 36.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 19.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 22.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 31.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.06 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -24.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 2.00M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 1.54 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 39.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 8.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 13.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 30.82% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 34.89% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LNG.
EPS Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for LNG.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | 27.21% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -15.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | 69.93% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 62.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 2.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 3.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 0.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 15.80% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices above its benchmark range — LNG looks rich relative to book.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 19.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 2.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 8.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 3.17% |