BKR vs. EQT: Baker Hughes vs. EQT Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and EQT (EQT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and EQT (EQT) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while EQT is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | EQT Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 30.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | -12.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 9.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 21.61% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 30.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.70 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -42.56% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 7.75M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | -0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% and EQT (EQT) at 10.49% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EQT
Energy industry group
10.49%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- EQT
- 10.49%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
EQT (EQT) at 29.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EQT
Energy industry group
29.01%
- Max
- 56.92%
- EQT
- 29.01%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and EQT (EQT) at 28.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EQT
Energy industry group
28.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EQT
- 28.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 10.49% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 6.25% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 29.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 28.24% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 80.40% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EQT (EQT) at 59.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
EQT (EQT) at 635.56% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | 59.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -11.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | 635.56% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -8.91% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while EQT (EQT) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for EQT.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EQT
Energy industry group
0.71
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- EQT
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
EQT (EQT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
0.19
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EQT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and EQT (EQT) at 1.30% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
1.30%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- EQT
- 1.30%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and EQT (EQT) at 15.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
15.64%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EQT
- 15.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 1.30% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 15.64% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and EQT (EQT) at 11.71 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
EQT
Energy industry group
11.71
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EQT
- 11.71
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while EQT (EQT) at 3.38 sits in the pricier quartile — EQT costs more per dollar of sales.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 5.40
- EQT
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 and EQT (EQT) at 1.21 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EQT
Energy industry group
1.21
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- EQT
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 11.71 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 3.38 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 1.21 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 8.01% |