BKR vs. DINO: Baker Hughes vs. HF Sinclair Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and HF Sinclair (DINO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and HF Sinclair (DINO) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while DINO is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | HF Sinclair Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 16.45 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 90.18% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 29.39% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 28.64% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 41.52% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.76 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -57.35% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 2.52M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 2.07 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 3.06 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 33.21% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 15.77% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 10.13% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 25.13% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 18.01% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | -5.99% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -11.07% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | 238.46% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -40.03% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 2.27 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.01 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 2.07% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 10.32% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 prices around its industry’s middle — DINO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | DINO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 4.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 0.47 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 1.43 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 18.17% |