BKR vs. CNQ: Baker Hughes vs. Canadian Natural Resources Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while CNQ is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 98.81 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | July 31, 2000 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 56.47% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 19.27% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 23.01% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 32.07% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -35.85% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 6.32M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 1.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 2.31 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 32.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CNQ.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
CNQ
Energy industry group
32.39%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CNQ
- 32.39%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 29.51% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
CNQ
Energy industry group
29.51%
- Max
- 56.92%
- CNQ
- 29.51%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 32.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
CNQ
Energy industry group
32.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CNQ
- 32.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 32.39% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 9.97% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 29.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 32.24% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 52.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 6.40% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 81.05% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CNQ.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | 6.40% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -3.75% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | 81.05% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 2.73% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 0.99 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
CNQ
Energy industry group
0.99
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- CNQ
- 0.99
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 0.42 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
CNQ
Energy industry group
0.42
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CNQ
- 0.42
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 0.99 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.67 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 5.03% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNQ the richer one.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CNQ
Energy industry group
5.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- CNQ
- 5.03%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 36.37% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CNQ
Energy industry group
36.37%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- CNQ
- 36.37%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 5.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 36.37% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 9.95 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
CNQ
Energy industry group
9.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CNQ
- 9.95
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 2.06 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
CNQ
Energy industry group
2.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- CNQ
- 2.06
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 2.97 carries an above-peer premium to book — CNQ is pricier on assets.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
CNQ
Energy industry group
2.97
- Max
- 4.21
- CNQ
- 2.97
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CNQ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 9.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 2.06 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 2.97 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 12.33% |