Seek Returns

BKR vs. CCJ: Baker Hughes vs. Cameco Stock Comparison

How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while CCJ is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.

Company profile comparison for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
Profile ItemBKRCCJ
NameBaker Hughes CompanyCameco Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesCoal & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization47.54 billion USD31.05 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateApril 6, 1987March 14, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BKR
CCJ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
Total Return (1Y)3.17%-18.97%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.12%21.14%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.57%22.20%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BKR
CCJ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)35.34%51.10%
Beta (5Y)1.101.18
Max Drawdown (5Y)-46.53%-49.04%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.67M3.27M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BKR and CCJ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.03-0.46
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.04-0.64

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% and Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

BKR

Energy industry group

15.06%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
BKR
15.06%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

10.08%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
BKR
10.08%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

BKR

Energy industry group

11.29%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
BKR
11.29%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
ROE (TTM)15.06%5.68%
ROA (TTM)4.46%2.79%
Net Margin (TTM)10.08%11.43%
Operating Margin (TTM)11.29%9.23%
Gross Margin (TTM)23.70%33.83%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% and Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.35%11.04%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.44%23.07%
EPS Growth (YoY)-12.75%246.15%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--83.08%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.24

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
BKR
1.24
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

BKR

Energy industry group

0.89

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
BKR
0.89
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.242.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.890.14
Net Debt / EBITDA2.570.19

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.99%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
BKR
1.99%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

BKR

Energy industry group

31.62%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
BKR
31.62%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.99%0.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.62%26.37%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

BKR

Energy industry group

16.45

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
BKR
16.45
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.65

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
BKR
1.65
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.

BKR

Energy industry group

2.36

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
BKR
2.36
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricBKRCCJ
P/E Ratio (TTM)16.45108.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.658.93
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.366.03
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)10.69%0.63%