Seek Returns logo

BKR vs. CCJ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BKR and CCJ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBKRCCJ
Company NameBaker Hughes CompanyCameco Corporation
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization44.13 billion USD32.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateApril 6, 1987March 14, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BKR and CCJ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BKR vs. CCJ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBKRCCJ
5-Day Price Return4.41%-2.49%
13-Week Price Return22.13%43.59%
26-Week Price Return-4.73%56.32%
52-Week Price Return29.93%80.90%
Month-to-Date Return-0.64%-0.03%
Year-to-Date Return9.12%45.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.87M3.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.44M4.99M
3-Month Volatility31.94%46.18%
Beta0.990.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BKR

17.98%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

BKR’s Return on Equity of 17.98% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCJ

8.27%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

CCJ’s Return on Equity of 8.27% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BKR

11.04%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.04% places BKR in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCJ

14.94%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

CCJ’s Net Profit Margin of 14.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BKR

11.71%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

BKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.71% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCJ

17.73%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

CCJ’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBKRCCJ
Return on Equity (TTM)17.98%8.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.98%5.59%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.04%14.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.71%17.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.58%26.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

1.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

BKR’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCJ

2.96

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

CCJ’s Current Ratio of 2.96 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

0.34

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CCJ

0.15

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, CCJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BKR

1.04

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CCJ

2.29

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, CCJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.29 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBKRCCJ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.412.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.001.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.340.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.042.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

BKR vs. CCJ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BKR vs. CCJ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BKR

2.05%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Yield of 2.05% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CCJ

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

CCJ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BKR

28.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.64% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCJ

51.41%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

CCJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.41% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBKRCCJ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.05%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.64%51.41%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BKR

13.96

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

BKR’s P/E Ratio of 13.96 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCJ

79.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 79.41, CCJ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BKR

1.54

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

BKR’s P/S Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCJ

11.87

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 11.87, CCJ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

2.15

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

BKR’s P/B Ratio of 2.15 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCJ

6.65

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 6.65, CCJ’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BKR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBKRCCJ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.9679.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.5411.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.156.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.6546.60