BKNG vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at BKNG and MU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BKNG dominates in value with a market cap of 178.62 billion USD, eclipsing MU’s 107.95 billion USD by roughly 1.65×.
With betas of 1.43 for BKNG and 1.21 for MU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | BKNG | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Booking Holdings Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Technology |
| Industry | Travel Services | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Glenn D. Fogel | Mr. Sanjay Mehrotra |
| Price | 5,489.25 USD | 96.593 USD |
| Market Cap | 178.62 billion USD | 107.95 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.43 | 1.21 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 31, 1999 | June 1, 1984 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of BKNG and MU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of BKNG and MU based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- BKNG has a negative P/B ratio of -29.50, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). MU, with a P/B of 2.21, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | BKNG | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 33.15 | 23.05 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.27 | 0.89 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.42 | 3.45 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -29.50 | 2.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.06 | 13.72 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.21 | 9.21 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.45 | 3.68 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 21.17 | 14.66 |
Dividend Comparison
Both BKNG and MU offer similar dividend yields (0.65% vs. 0.48%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | BKNG | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of BKNG and MU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BKNG has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.70), an unusual warning sign, while MU at 0.31 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
| Symbol | BKNG | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.22 | 3.13 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.22 | 1.99 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.70 | 0.31 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.27 | 11.94 |