Seek Returns logo

BK vs. KKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at BK and KKR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

KKR’s market capitalization of 113.80 billion USD is significantly greater than BK’s 65.25 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

KKR carries a higher beta at 1.88, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while BK (beta: 1.07) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolBKKKR
Company NameThe Bank of New York Mellon CorporationKKR & Co. Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset Management
CEOMr. Robin Antony VinceMr. Joseph Y. Bae
Price91.2 USD127.77 USD
Market Cap65.25 billion USD113.80 billion USD
Beta1.071.88
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 3, 1973July 15, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BK and KKR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Profitability

Return on Equity

BK

11.30%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
17.77%
Median
11.02%
Q1
5.49%
Min
-5.72%

BK’s Return on Equity of 11.30% is on par with the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KKR

9.12%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
17.77%
Median
11.02%
Q1
5.49%
Min
-5.72%

KKR’s Return on Equity of 9.12% is on par with the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their ROE against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

BK

294.89%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
19.52%
Median
8.19%
Q1
3.10%
Min
-19.32%

BK’s Return on Invested Capital of 294.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

KKR

-0.03%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
19.52%
Median
8.19%
Q1
3.10%
Min
-19.32%

KKR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.03%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their ROIC against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

BK

25.40%

Asset Management Industry

Max
96.38%
Q3
57.95%
Median
28.52%
Q1
13.09%
Min
-27.65%

BK’s Net Profit Margin of 25.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KKR

14.63%

Asset Management Industry

Max
96.38%
Q3
57.95%
Median
28.52%
Q1
13.09%
Min
-27.65%

KKR’s Net Profit Margin of 14.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

BK

33.62%

Asset Management Industry

Max
101.75%
Q3
75.73%
Median
34.03%
Q1
20.18%
Min
-48.25%

BK’s Operating Profit Margin of 33.62% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KKR

-0.81%

Asset Management Industry

Max
101.75%
Q3
75.73%
Median
34.03%
Q1
20.18%
Min
-48.25%

KKR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.81%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBKKKR
Return on Equity (TTM)11.30%9.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.07%0.59%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)294.89%-0.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.40%14.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.62%-0.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)99.59%18.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

BK

--

Asset Management Industry

Max
8.56
Q3
4.79
Median
2.80
Q1
0.96
Min
0.01

Current Ratio data for BK is currently unavailable.

KKR

4.11

Asset Management Industry

Max
8.56
Q3
4.79
Median
2.80
Q1
0.96
Min
0.01

KKR’s Current Ratio of 4.11 aligns with the median group of the Asset Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

BK

0.76

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.66
Q3
1.52
Median
0.75
Q1
0.30
Min
0.01

BK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.76 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KKR

1.85

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.66
Q3
1.52
Median
0.75
Q1
0.30
Min
0.01

KKR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Asset Management industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

BK

0.39

Asset Management Industry

Max
16.00
Q3
7.38
Median
2.71
Q1
1.06
Min
-6.91

BK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.39 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

KKR

-0.04

Asset Management Industry

Max
16.00
Q3
7.38
Median
2.71
Q1
1.06
Min
-6.91

KKR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.04. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBKKKR
Current Ratio (TTM)--4.11
Quick Ratio (TTM)--4.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.761.85
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.070.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-11.613.86
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.39-0.04

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for BK and KKR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth (YoY)

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

EPS Growth (YoY)

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year EPS (Earnings Per Share) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth (YoY)

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

BK

2.06%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.47%
Q3
11.99%
Median
5.57%
Q1
2.47%
Min
0.00%

BK’s Dividend Yield of 2.06% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KKR

0.56%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.47%
Q3
11.99%
Median
5.57%
Q1
2.47%
Min
0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Yield of 0.56% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

BK

33.02%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
125.13%
Median
66.75%
Q1
27.53%
Min
0.00%

BK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.02% is within the typical range for the Asset Management industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KKR

28.15%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
125.13%
Median
66.75%
Q1
27.53%
Min
0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.15% is within the typical range for the Asset Management industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBKKKR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.06%0.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.02%28.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

BK

13.92

Asset Management Industry

Max
41.77
Q3
23.10
Median
11.55
Q1
8.17
Min
1.56

BK’s P/E Ratio of 13.92 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KKR

51.40

Asset Management Industry

Max
41.77
Q3
23.10
Median
11.55
Q1
8.17
Min
1.56

At 51.40, KKR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

BK

1.28

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.44
Median
1.47
Q1
0.65
Min
0.02

BK’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.28 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

KKR

2.10

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.44
Median
1.47
Q1
0.65
Min
0.02

KKR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.10 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

BK

3.51

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.37
Q3
7.17
Median
4.68
Q1
2.86
Min
0.00

BK’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KKR

7.54

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.37
Q3
7.17
Median
4.68
Q1
2.86
Min
0.00

KKR’s P/S Ratio of 7.54 is in the upper echelon for the Asset Management industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

BK

1.52

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.18
Q3
2.75
Median
1.07
Q1
0.85
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

KKR

4.13

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.18
Q3
2.75
Median
1.07
Q1
0.85
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

BK vs. KKR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBKKKR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.9251.40
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.282.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.517.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.524.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)28.5015.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-2.5717.27
EV-to-Sales (TTM)-1.009.71