BEN vs. VIRT: Franklin Templeton vs. Virtu Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Virtu Financial (VIRT) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BEN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while VIRT falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has an aggressive beta of 1.52, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Virtu Financial (VIRT) is defensive at 0.69 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 57.03% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 11.42% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 17.96% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 14.61% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 36.32% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Virtu Financial (VIRT) reports revenue growth of 26.25%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 72.73% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Virtu Financial (VIRT) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Virtu Financial (VIRT) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 4.10% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 1.78% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BEN the richer one.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 89.12% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 15.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 7.92 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 17.12 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for VIRT, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

On P/S ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 3.35 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

On P/B ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 1.92 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics