Seek Returns

BEN vs. GS: Franklin Templeton vs. Goldman Sachs Stock Comparison

How do Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BEN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while GS falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Company profile comparison for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
Profile ItemBENGS
NameFranklin Templeton Inc.The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryAsset Management & Custody BanksInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization17.29 billion USD249.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 23, 1983May 4, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BEN
GS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
Total Return (1Y)70.17%17.85%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)22.48%44.69%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)5.29%20.41%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BEN
GS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)29.18%33.28%
Beta (5Y)1.521.27
Max Drawdown (5Y)-45.39%-30.90%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.70M2.10M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BEN and GS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)2.260.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)3.550.59

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

10.51%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
BEN
10.51%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

GS

Financial Services industry group

17.71%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
GS
17.71%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 11.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

11.42%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
BEN
11.42%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

GS

Financial Services industry group

31.21%

Max
62.84%
GS
31.21%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 14.61% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

14.61%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
BEN
14.61%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

GS

Financial Services industry group

38.37%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
GS
38.37%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
ROE (TTM)10.51%17.71%
ROA (TTM)--1.11%
Net Margin (TTM)11.42%31.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)14.61%38.37%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Only one side can be read here: Goldman Sachs (GS) reports revenue growth of 8.92%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for BEN.

Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
Revenue Growth (YoY)--8.92%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)--7.16%
EPS Growth (YoY)116.48%26.59%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)4.63%19.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 4.10% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BEN the richer one.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

4.10%

Max
9.77%
BEN
4.10%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GS

Financial Services industry group

2.07%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
GS
2.07%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 89.12% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 25.88% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

89.12%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
BEN
89.12%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GS

Financial Services industry group

25.88%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
GS
25.88%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.10%2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)89.12%25.88%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 17.12 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

17.12

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
BEN
17.12
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

GS

Financial Services industry group

12.45

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
GS
12.45
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

1.84

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
BEN
1.84
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

GS

Financial Services industry group

3.52

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
GS
3.52
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

BEN

Financial Services industry group

1.46

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
BEN
1.46
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

GS

Financial Services industry group

2.36

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
GS
2.36
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricBENGS
P/E Ratio (TTM)17.1212.45
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.843.52
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.462.36
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----