BEN vs. COIN: Franklin Templeton vs. Coinbase Global Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Coinbase Global (COIN) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BEN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while COIN falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has more than two decades of public-market history since September 23, 1983, whereas Coinbase Global (COIN) listed on April 14, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative ROE of -4.68%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports 10.51%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative net margin of -12.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports 11.42%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative operating margin of -1.42%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports 14.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Coinbase Global (COIN) reports revenue growth of 9.40%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Coinbase Global (COIN) at -53.06% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Coinbase Global (COIN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Coinbase Global (COIN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Coinbase Global (COIN) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports a yield of 4.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coinbase Global (COIN) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports a payout of 89.12%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) trades at 17.12 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Coinbase Global (COIN) has no P/E ratio this period.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Coinbase Global (COIN) at 6.56 sits in the pricier quartile — COIN costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 and Coinbase Global (COIN) at 2.56 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics