BEN vs. CBOE: Franklin Templeton vs. Cboe Global Markets Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BEN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while CBOE falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has an aggressive beta of 1.52, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CBOE.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 11.42% and Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 14.61% and Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports revenue growth of 15.13%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for BEN.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 4.10% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BEN the richer one.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 89.12% and Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 17.12 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the pricier quartile — CBOE costs more per dollar of sales.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics