BEKE vs. JLL: KE vs. JLL Stock Comparison

Company Profile

KE (BEKE) and JLL (JLL) are both classified in the Real Estate Services sub-industry within the broader Real Estate Management & Development industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

JLL (JLL) has more than two decades of public-market history since July 17, 1997, whereas KE (BEKE) listed on August 13, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

JLL (JLL) trades as ordinary local shares, while KE (BEKE) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

KE (BEKE) reports a negative beta of -0.26, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. JLL (JLL) has a non-negative beta of 1.24.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

JLL (JLL) at 13.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while KE (BEKE) at 5.08% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for JLL.

Both KE (BEKE) at 3.77% and JLL (JLL) at 3.64% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both KE (BEKE) at 6.74% and JLL (JLL) at 4.57% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

JLL (JLL) at 11.45% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while KE (BEKE) at 1.20% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

JLL (JLL) at 45.13% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while KE (BEKE) at -25.22% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for JLL.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

KE (BEKE) at 1.63 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while JLL (JLL) at 1.13 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for JLL.

Both KE (BEKE) at 0.25 and JLL (JLL) at 0.42 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

JLL (JLL) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile KE (BEKE) reports a yield of 11.39%, ranking against industry peers normally.

JLL (JLL) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile KE (BEKE) reports a payout of 88.12%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both KE (BEKE) at 38.66 and JLL (JLL) at 17.73 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Both KE (BEKE) at 0.21 and JLL (JLL) at 0.63 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

On P/B ratio, both KE (BEKE) at 2.00 and JLL (JLL) at 2.31 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics