Beike (BEKE) vs. Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL)

Company Profile

Beike (BEKE) and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) are both classified in the Real Estate Services sub-industry within the broader Real Estate Management & Development industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) has more than two decades of public-market history since July 17, 1997, whereas Beike (BEKE) listed on August 13, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Beike (BEKE) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Historical Performance

Beike (BEKE) is heavily traded at around 11.08M shares per day, whereas Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) sees a more moderate 0.50M — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Profitability

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 12.35% ranks in the top quartile for Return on Equity (TTM), ahead of Beike (BEKE) at 4.41%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

Both Beike (BEKE) at 3.17% and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 3.35% post Net Profit Margin (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on net profitability.

Both Beike (BEKE) at 2.12% and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 4.42% post Operating Profit Margin (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on operating profitability.

Profitability at a Glance

Financial Strength

Both Beike (BEKE) at 1.61 and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 1.12 carry Current Ratio (MRQ) within their industry mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Beike (BEKE) at 0.02 maintains Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) in the lower-leverage quartile of industry peers, ahead of Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 0.42, which sits around the industry mid-range.

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) reports Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of 8.62 and can be ranked against industry peers; Beike (BEKE) has no value available for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Dividend

Neither Beike (BEKE) nor Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Beike (BEKE) nor Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend at a Glance

Valuation

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 15.08 trades in the lower-multiple quartile for Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM), while Beike (BEKE) at 46.32 sits around the industry midpoint — JLL has a lower trailing earnings multiple relative to peers, though the gap should be read alongside growth and earnings quality.

Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 0.50 trades in the lower-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Beike (BEKE) at 1.47 sits around the industry midpoint — JLL has a lower trailing revenue multiple relative to peers, though the gap should be read alongside growth and margins.

Both Beike (BEKE) at 1.91 and Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) at 1.95 post Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on book-value multiple.

Valuation at a Glance