BE vs. MMM: Bloom Energy vs. 3M Stock Comparison
How do Bloom Energy (BE) and 3M (MMM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Bloom Energy (BE) and 3M (MMM) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while MMM is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.
| Profile Item | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Bloom Energy Corp. Class A Common Stock | 3M Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Industrial Conglomerates |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Heavy Electrical Equipment | Industrial Conglomerates |
| Market Capitalization | 51.20 billion USD | 95.67 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 25, 2018 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 46.07% | 16.26% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 162.89% | 38.64% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 41.93% | 8.14% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Bloom Energy (BE) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas 3M (MMM) is closer to market-like at 0.97 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 112.64% | 27.61% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.61 | 0.97 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -74.98% | -48.86% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 15.48M | 3.14M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.57 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but 3M (MMM) at 72.97% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% also sits in the top quartile.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
39.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- BE
- 39.61%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
72.97%
- MMM
- 72.97%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% and 3M (MMM) at 14.01% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.53%
- Max
- 27.47%
- BE
- 13.53%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
14.01%
- Max
- 27.47%
- MMM
- 14.01%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% and 3M (MMM) at 23.69% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
18.49%
- Max
- 36.60%
- BE
- 18.49%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.69%
- Max
- 36.60%
- MMM
- 23.69%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.61% | 72.97% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.45% | 8.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.53% | 14.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.49% | 23.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.77% | 39.53% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while 3M (MMM) at 1.52% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: 3M (MMM) reports EPS growth of -20.53%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 37.33% | 1.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.06% | -1.57% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -20.53% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -16.16% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while 3M (MMM) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 5.22
- BE
- 3.74
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- MMM
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but MMM is more stretched: Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and 3M (MMM) at 3.04 is above its industry benchmark range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 2.33
- BE
- 1.42
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.04
- MMM
- 3.04
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.74 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.42 | 3.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.50 | 1.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile 3M (MMM) reports a yield of 1.64%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 2.66%
- MMM
- 1.64%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile 3M (MMM) reports a payout of 45.82%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
45.82%
- Max
- 67.39%
- MMM
- 45.82%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.64% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 45.82% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 27.63 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BE’s trailing earnings.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
104.99
- BE
- 104.99
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
27.63
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MMM
- 27.63
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: 3M (MMM) at 3.79 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.37
- BE
- 13.37
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.79
- Max
- 7.54
- MMM
- 3.79
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 and 3M (MMM) at 23.18 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
26.49
- BE
- 26.49
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.18
- MMM
- 23.18
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BE | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 104.99 | 27.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 13.37 | 3.79 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 26.49 | 23.18 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.00% | 6.66% |