BE vs. IR: Bloom Energy vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do Bloom Energy (BE) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Bloom Energy (BE) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while IR is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Bloom Energy Corp. Class A Common Stock | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Heavy Electrical Equipment | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 51.20 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 25, 2018 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 46.07% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 162.89% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 41.93% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Bloom Energy (BE) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Ingersoll Rand (IR) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 112.64% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.61 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -74.98% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 15.48M | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.57 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BE.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
39.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- BE
- 39.61%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.53%
- Max
- 27.47%
- BE
- 13.53%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
18.49%
- Max
- 36.60%
- BE
- 18.49%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.61% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.45% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.53% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.49% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.77% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BE.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports EPS growth of -29.61%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 37.33% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.06% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 5.22
- BE
- 3.74
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 uses more debt funding than most peers.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 2.33
- BE
- 1.42
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.74 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.42 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.50 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a payout of 2.27%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BE’s trailing earnings.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
104.99
- BE
- 104.99
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.37
- BE
- 13.37
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 prices above its benchmark range — BE looks rich relative to book.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
26.49
- BE
- 26.49
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BE | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 104.99 | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 13.37 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 26.49 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.00% | 3.19% |