BE vs. GWW: Bloom Energy vs. W.W. Grainger Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Bloom Energy (BE) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while GWW is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Bloom Energy (BE) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas W.W. Grainger (GWW) is closer to market-like at 0.93 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Bloom Energy (BE) is heavily traded at around 15.48M shares per day, whereas W.W. Grainger (GWW) sees a more moderate 250.35K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both companies show strong equity returns, but W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 52.33% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% also sits in the top quartile.

Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 11.17%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 16.14%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 4.51% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BE.

Only one side can be read here: W.W. Grainger (GWW) reports EPS growth of -8.55%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile W.W. Grainger (GWW) reports a yield of 0.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile W.W. Grainger (GWW) reports a payout of 20.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 31.66 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BE’s trailing earnings.

W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 3.48 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 clears its benchmark range — BE looks notably rich on sales.

Measured against book value, both Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 15.56 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics