BDX vs. FMS: Becton, Dickinson vs. Fresenius Medical Care Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Becton, Dickinson (BDX) and Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but BDX is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies while FMS is classified in Health Care Providers & Services.

Becton, Dickinson (BDX) trades as ordinary local shares, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 5.66% and Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 7.84% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 5.89% and Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 4.22% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 21.63% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 9.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 8.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 1.51% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 83.61% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at -1.86% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FMS.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 0.87 and Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.99 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 0.66 and Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.79 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Becton, Dickinson (BDX) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports a yield of 6.30%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 72.49% and Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 50.14% pay out more of their earnings than any of their industry peers — the thinnest cover in their groups, so dividend headroom deserves attention.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 13.53 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 41.87 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for FMS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.62 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 2.97 prices around its industry’s middle — FMS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.85 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Becton, Dickinson (BDX) at 2.34 is valued near its industry’s middle — FMS is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics