BCH vs. MFG: Banco de Chile vs. Mizuho Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco de Chile (BCH) and Mizuho Financial (MFG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Banco de Chile (BCH) and Mizuho Financial (MFG) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Banco de Chile (BCH) at 21.08% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 12.49%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Banco de Chile (BCH) at 45.15% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 29.14%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 15.82% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at -1.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 43.61% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at -1.84% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Banco de Chile (BCH) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Mizuho Financial (MFG) reports a yield of 1,544.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 24.88% keeps its payout in the industry’s typical band, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at 85.54% pays out more than any of its peers — the most stretched cover in its group.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 12.88 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at 14.81 sits in the richer quartile — BCH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco de Chile (BCH) at 0.69 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 1.57 is valued near its industry’s middle — BCH is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics