BCH vs. CM: Banco de Chile vs. Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco de Chile (BCH) and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Banco de Chile (BCH) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Banco de Chile (BCH) at 21.08% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.58% also sits in the top quartile.

Banco de Chile (BCH) at 45.15% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 33.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 13.66% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at -1.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 17.72% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at -1.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Banco de Chile (BCH) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) reports a yield of 3.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 40.12% keeps its payout in the industry’s typical band, while Banco de Chile (BCH) at 85.54% pays out more than any of its peers — the most stretched cover in its group.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Banco de Chile (BCH) at 14.81 and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.32 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco de Chile (BCH) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco de Chile (BCH) at 0.69 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 2.24 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics