BAX vs. CI: Baxter vs. Cigna Stock Comparison
How do Baxter (BAX) and Cigna (CI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baxter (BAX) and Cigna (CI) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but BAX is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies while CI is classified in Health Care Providers & Services.
| Profile Item | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baxter International Inc. | The Cigna Group |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
| GICS Industry Group | Health Care Equipment & Services | Health Care Equipment & Services |
| GICS Industry | Health Care Equipment & Supplies | Health Care Providers & Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Health Care Equipment | Health Care Services |
| Market Capitalization | 13.34 billion USD | 77.36 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 27, 1981 | March 31, 1982 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 45.72% | 13.95% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -5.53% | 2.65% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.96% | 8.40% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.31% | 26.82% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.24 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -80.61% | -32.10% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.53M | 1.55M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.98 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.42 | 0.54 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Baxter (BAX) reports a negative ROE of -9.04%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cigna (CI) reports 15.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
-9.04%
- Max
- 47.61%
- Q3
- 14.36%
- Median
- 5.45%
- BAX
- -9.04%
- Q1
- -10.67%
- Min
- -47.01%
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
15.65%
- Max
- 47.61%
- CI
- 15.65%
- Q3
- 14.36%
- Median
- 5.45%
- Q1
- -10.67%
- Min
- -47.01%
Net Margin (TTM)
Baxter (BAX) reports a negative net margin of -6.23%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cigna (CI) reports 2.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
-6.23%
- Max
- 29.35%
- Q3
- 9.33%
- Median
- 2.18%
- BAX
- -6.23%
- Q1
- -6.29%
- Min
- -28.46%
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
2.09%
- Max
- 29.35%
- Q3
- 9.33%
- Median
- 2.18%
- CI
- 2.09%
- Q1
- -6.29%
- Min
- -28.46%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baxter (BAX) at 9.88% and Cigna (CI) at 3.48% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
9.88%
- Max
- 35.43%
- Q3
- 14.14%
- BAX
- 9.88%
- Median
- 6.81%
- Q1
- -0.28%
- Min
- -16.29%
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
3.48%
- Max
- 35.43%
- Q3
- 14.14%
- Median
- 6.81%
- CI
- 3.48%
- Q1
- -0.28%
- Min
- -16.29%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -9.04% | 15.65% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.71% | 4.29% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -6.23% | 2.09% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.88% | 3.48% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.37% | 9.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Baxter (BAX) at 5.72% and Cigna (CI) at 11.26% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Cigna (CI) reports EPS growth of 83.00%, ranked against its industry; Baxter (BAX) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.72% | 11.26% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.79% | 15.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 83.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 1.36% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Baxter (BAX) at 1.79 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cigna (CI) at 0.84 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CI.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
1.79
- Max
- 7.59
- Q3
- 4.00
- Median
- 1.98
- BAX
- 1.79
- Q1
- 1.37
- Min
- 0.30
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
0.84
- Max
- 7.59
- Q3
- 4.00
- Median
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.37
- CI
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.30
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cigna (CI) at 0.71 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Baxter (BAX) at 1.36 uses more debt funding than most peers.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
1.36
- Max
- 1.88
- BAX
- 1.36
- Q3
- 0.91
- Median
- 0.58
- Q1
- 0.16
- Min
- 0.00
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
0.71
- Max
- 1.88
- Q3
- 0.91
- CI
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.58
- Q1
- 0.16
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.79 | 0.84 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.36 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.73 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baxter (BAX) at 0.16% and Cigna (CI) at 2.05% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
0.16%
- BAX
- 0.16%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
2.05%
- CI
- 2.05%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Baxter (BAX) reports payout ratio above 100% at 154.67%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Cigna (CI) reports 27.29%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
154.67%
- BAX
- 154.67%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
27.29%
- CI
- 27.29%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.16% | 2.05% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 154.67% | 27.29% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cigna (CI) trades at 12.94 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Baxter (BAX) has no P/E ratio this period.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 80.41
- Q3
- 47.62
- Median
- 29.93
- Q1
- 21.19
- Min
- 4.21
- BAX
- --
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
12.94
- Max
- 80.41
- Q3
- 47.62
- Median
- 29.93
- Q1
- 21.19
- CI
- 12.94
- Min
- 4.21
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cigna (CI) at 0.27 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Baxter (BAX) at 1.15 prices around its industry’s middle — CI costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 8.80
- Q3
- 4.32
- Median
- 2.13
- BAX
- 1.15
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.03
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
0.27
- Max
- 8.80
- Q3
- 4.32
- Median
- 2.13
- Q1
- 1.10
- CI
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Baxter (BAX) at 2.05 and Cigna (CI) at 1.79 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
BAX
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
2.05
- Max
- 11.68
- Q3
- 6.12
- Median
- 3.00
- BAX
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.73
- Min
- -1.31
CI
Health Care Equipment & Services industry group
1.79
- Max
- 11.68
- Q3
- 6.12
- Median
- 3.00
- CI
- 1.79
- Q1
- 1.73
- Min
- -1.31
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BAX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 12.94 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.15 | 0.27 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.05 | 1.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.16% | 10.59% |