Seek Returns

BAP vs. RF: Credicorp vs. Regions Financial Stock Comparison

How do Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF) both belong to the Banks industry, though BAP is classified under Diversified Banks while RF falls under Regional Banks.

Company profile comparison for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
Profile ItemBAPRF
NameCredicorp Ltd.Regions Financial Corp.
Country/RegionPeruUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupBanksBanks
GICS IndustryBanksBanks
GICS Sub-IndustryDiversified BanksRegional Banks
Market Capitalization27.63 billion USD24.06 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 25, 1995March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BAP
RF
GSPC
Loading price history…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
Total Return (1Y)44.06%22.28%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)52.62%30.40%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)29.84%8.09%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BAP
RF
GSPC
Loading price history…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)34.92%23.37%
Beta (5Y)0.871.00
Max Drawdown (5Y)-33.33%-40.99%
Avg. Volume (3M)316.59K9.26M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BAP and RF are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.140.77
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.751.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Credicorp (BAP) at 20.41% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Regions Financial (RF) at 12.38%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

BAP

Banks industry group

20.41%

BAP
20.41%
Max
19.84%
Q3
13.67%
Median
11.49%
Q1
9.50%
Min
3.64%

RF

Banks industry group

12.38%

Max
19.84%
Q3
13.67%
RF
12.38%
Median
11.49%
Q1
9.50%
Min
3.64%
Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their ROE against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 33.10% and Regions Financial (RF) at 31.29% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

BAP

Banks industry group

33.10%

Max
47.19%
Q3
35.25%
BAP
33.10%
Median
31.21%
Q1
27.11%
Min
14.93%

RF

Banks industry group

31.29%

Max
47.19%
Q3
35.25%
RF
31.29%
Median
31.21%
Q1
27.11%
Min
14.93%
Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their net margin against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
ROE (TTM)20.41%12.38%
ROA (TTM)2.84%1.42%
Net Margin (TTM)33.10%31.29%
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 11.57% and Regions Financial (RF) at 6.25% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 26.04% and Regions Financial (RF) at 19.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.57%6.25%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)12.30%1.65%
EPS Growth (YoY)26.04%19.17%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)14.42%0.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Regions Financial (RF) at 3.85% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Credicorp (BAP) at 14.37% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

BAP

Banks industry group

14.37%

BAP
14.37%
Max
5.79%
Q3
3.18%
Median
2.39%
Q1
1.20%
Min
0.00%

RF

Banks industry group

3.85%

Max
5.79%
RF
3.85%
Q3
3.18%
Median
2.39%
Q1
1.20%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 53.95% and Regions Financial (RF) at 43.27% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

BAP

Banks industry group

53.95%

Max
70.75%
BAP
53.95%
Q3
41.28%
Median
29.26%
Q1
18.98%
Min
0.00%

RF

Banks industry group

43.27%

Max
70.75%
RF
43.27%
Q3
41.28%
Median
29.26%
Q1
18.98%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
Dividend Yield (TTM)14.37%3.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)53.95%43.27%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 13.10 and Regions Financial (RF) at 11.10 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

BAP

Banks industry group

13.10

Max
18.16
Q3
13.75
BAP
13.10
Median
11.81
Q1
10.64
Min
6.49

RF

Banks industry group

11.10

Max
18.16
Q3
13.75
Median
11.81
RF
11.10
Q1
10.64
Min
6.49
Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Banks industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

P/S ratio is set aside for both Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Regions Financial (RF) at 1.46 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Credicorp (BAP) at 2.57 prices above its benchmark range — BAP looks rich relative to book.

BAP

Banks industry group

2.57

BAP
2.57
Max
2.28
Q3
1.58
Median
1.32
Q1
1.10
Min
0.59

RF

Banks industry group

1.46

Max
2.28
Q3
1.58
RF
1.46
Median
1.32
Q1
1.10
Min
0.59
Loading chart…
Credicorp (BAP) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Credicorp (BAP) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricBAPRF
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.1011.10
P/S Ratio (TTM)----
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.571.46
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----