BAM vs. PAYP: Brookfield Asset Management vs. PayPay Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and PayPay (PAYP) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but BAM is classified in Capital Markets while PAYP is classified in Financial Services.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) has traded publicly since December 1, 2022, giving it several years of listed trading history, while PayPay (PAYP) only listed on March 12, 2026 and has a limited public-market record.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) trades as ordinary local shares, while PayPay (PAYP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both BAM and PAYP need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while PayPay (PAYP) at 18.80% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BAM.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while PayPay (PAYP) at 15.85% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of PayPay (PAYP) at 32.79%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% and PayPay (PAYP) at 25.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

PayPay (PAYP) at 230.06% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports a yield of 0.83%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 and PayPay (PAYP) at 23.30 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PayPay (PAYP) at 0.02 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 and PayPay (PAYP) at 3.75 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics