BAM vs. ICE: Brookfield Asset Management vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BAM is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while ICE falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 16, 2005, whereas Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) listed on December 1, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BAM.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% also retains a top-quartile share.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 0.83% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports 27.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Both look expensive on sales: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics