BAM vs. HOOD: Brookfield Asset Management vs. Robinhood Markets Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BAM is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while HOOD falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) is closer to market-like at 1.17 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BAM.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 39.04% also retains a top-quartile share.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for HOOD.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports a yield of 0.83%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 sits in the richer quartile — HOOD needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics