Seek Returns

BAH vs. GFL: Booz Allen Hamilton vs. GFL Environmental Stock Comparison

How do Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but BAH is classified in Professional Services while GFL is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies.

Company profile comparison for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
Profile ItemBAHGFL
NameBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class A Common StockGFL Environmental Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesCommercial Services & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryResearch & Consulting ServicesEnvironmental & Facilities Services
Market Capitalization10.16 billion USD16.72 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BAH
GFL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
Total Return (1Y)2.63%7.30%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-9.38%17.51%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)1.84%3.62%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BAH
GFL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.02%29.80%
Beta (5Y)0.290.66
Max Drawdown (5Y)-66.59%-42.75%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.79M3.45M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BAH and GFL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.040.10
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.060.15

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative ROE of -2.97%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reports 70.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

70.00%

BAH
70.00%
Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-2.97%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
GFL
-2.97%
Min
-20.15%
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative net margin of -4.28%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reports 7.14%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.14%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
BAH
7.14%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-4.28%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
GFL
-4.28%
Min
-8.60%
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.82% and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 9.44% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.82%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
BAH
8.82%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

9.44%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
GFL
9.44%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
ROE (TTM)70.00%-2.97%
ROA (TTM)8.48%1.11%
Net Margin (TTM)7.14%-4.28%
Operating Margin (TTM)8.82%9.44%
Gross Margin (TTM)22.58%19.78%

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 7.77% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -6.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reports EPS growth of -4.83%, ranked against its industry; GFL Environmental (GFL) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
Revenue Growth (YoY)-6.37%7.77%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)6.60%-0.72%
EPS Growth (YoY)-4.83%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)50.35%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 1.44 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.93 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for GFL.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.44

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
BAH
1.44
Q1
1.09
Min
0.45

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
GFL
0.93
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 1.04 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 3.78 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.78

BAH
3.78
Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.04

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
GFL
1.04
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.440.93
Debt / Equity (MRQ)3.781.04
Net Debt / EBITDA3.566.75

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 2.60% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.14% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BAH the richer one.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.60%

Max
4.33%
BAH
2.60%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.14%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
GFL
0.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 36.02% and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 19.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.02%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
BAH
36.02%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.07%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
GFL
19.07%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.60%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.02%19.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) trades at 13.25 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while GFL Environmental (GFL) has no P/E ratio this period.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

13.25

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
BAH
13.25
Min
1.89

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

--

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
GFL
--
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): GFL does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; BAH is benchmarked against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 0.93 and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.25 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
Median
1.33
BAH
0.93
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.25

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
GFL
2.25
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.42 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.17 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAH is pricier on assets.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.17

Max
11.25
BAH
8.17
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.42

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
GFL
2.42
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78
Loading chart…
Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricBAHGFL
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.25--
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.932.25
P/B Ratio (MRQ)8.172.42
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.76%1.55%