Seek Returns logo

BAH vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAH and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAHGFL
Company NameBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization13.46 billion USD18.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAH and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAH vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAHGFL
5-Day Price Return-1.78%-0.69%
13-Week Price Return-14.88%-0.10%
26-Week Price Return-10.04%5.17%
52-Week Price Return-25.75%21.85%
Month-to-Date Return2.15%-1.13%
Year-to-Date Return-14.81%7.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M0.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.02M0.36M
3-Month Volatility42.38%21.45%
Beta0.430.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAH

107.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

BAH’s Return on Equity of 107.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAH

10.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

BAH’s Net Profit Margin of 10.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAH

13.60%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

BAH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.60% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAHGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)107.71%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.12%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.08%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.60%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.65%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

1.78

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

BAH’s Current Ratio of 1.78 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

3.74

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.74, BAH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAH

8.26

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

BAH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAHGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.780.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.740.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.26-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAH vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAH vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAH

2.01%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Yield of 2.01% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAH

22.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAHGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.01%0.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.52%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAH

11.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, BAH’s P/E Ratio of 11.20 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GFL

7.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAH

1.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

BAH’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GFL

3.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

12.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

BAH’s P/B Ratio of 12.13 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAH vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAHGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.207.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.133.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.133.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.6976.39