Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

BABA’s market capitalization of 254.63 billion USD is substantially larger than SW’s 24.64 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

SW carries a higher beta at 1.02, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while BABA (beta: 0.21) exhibits greater stability.

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SW is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABASW
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedSmurfit Westrock Plc
CountryCNIE
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailPackaging & Containers
CEOYongming WuAnthony Paul J. Smurfit
Price106.72 USD47.2 USD
Market Cap254.63 billion USD24.64 billion USD
Beta0.211.02
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateSeptember 19, 2014July 8, 2024
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

BABA

13.33%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.33% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SW

3.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
20.97%
Q3
18.53%
Median
9.15%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-15.31%

SW’s Return on Equity of 3.27% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

BABA

7.90%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

BABA’s Return on Invested Capital of 7.90% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

SW

2.28%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
11.55%
Q3
9.42%
Median
6.03%
Q1
2.83%
Min
-6.57%

SW’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.28% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

BABA

13.06%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.06% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SW

1.95%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
10.07%
Q3
5.37%
Median
3.61%
Q1
1.49%
Min
-2.97%

SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.95% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

BABA

14.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SW

4.83%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
14.60%
Q3
11.93%
Median
8.05%
Q1
5.47%
Min
2.09%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.83% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABASW
Return on Equity (TTM)13.33%3.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.21%1.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)7.90%2.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%1.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.14%4.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.95%19.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

BABA

1.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SW

1.43

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.79
Median
1.38
Q1
1.16
Min
0.80

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.43 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

BABA

0.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW

0.80

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
2.22
Median
1.22
Q1
0.79
Min
0.56

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

BABA

19.85

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.85 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SW

1.83

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
6.21
Q3
4.64
Median
2.89
Q1
1.61
Min
-0.51

SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.83 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABASW
Current Ratio (TTM)1.551.43
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.550.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.250.80
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.140.32
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.554.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)19.851.83

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for BABA and SW. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

BABA

3.41%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.41%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SW

3.11%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
9.30%
Q3
4.22%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.42%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.11% is consistent with its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

BABA

22.23%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.23% is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SW

177.18%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
223.77%
Q3
154.70%
Median
54.74%
Q1
23.39%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 177.18% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABASW
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.41%3.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.23%177.18%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

BABA

13.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 13.64 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SW

51.24

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
57.57
Q3
40.45
Median
25.12
Q1
18.16
Min
10.25

A P/E Ratio of 51.24 places SW in the upper quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

BABA

1.26

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

BABA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.26 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

SW

2.85

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
2.69
Median
2.20
Q1
2.02
Min
2.02

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.85 places SW in the upper quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

BABA

1.85

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SW

2.01

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.28
Median
0.99
Q1
0.75
Min
0.36

With a P/S Ratio of 2.01, SW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Packaging & Containers industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

BABA

1.76

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.76 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SW

1.38

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
5.73
Q3
3.44
Median
2.08
Q1
1.76
Min
0.55

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.38 is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BABA vs. SW: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Packaging & Containers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABASW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.6451.24
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.262.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.852.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.761.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)28.09-9508.47
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.3220.13
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.952.55