Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MBLY is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAMBLY
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedMobileye Global Inc.
CountryHong KongIsrael
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization381.16 billion USD9.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014October 26, 2022
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAMBLY
5-Day Price Return-1.92%-4.57%
13-Week Price Return29.91%-12.06%
26-Week Price Return17.65%-27.27%
52-Week Price Return74.11%-28.83%
Month-to-Date Return-7.46%-6.31%
Year-to-Date Return86.00%-38.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume14.51M3.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume17.75M5.83M
3-Month Volatility52.90%44.69%
Beta0.350.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-2.79%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -2.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MBLY

-17.34%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -17.34%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-19.92%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -19.92%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAMBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%-2.79%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%-2.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%-17.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%-19.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%48.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MBLY

6.46

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.46 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAMBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.456.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.975.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.56-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.14%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.14%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAMBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

18.22

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 18.22 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.70

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY

4.97

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 4.97, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MBLY

0.96

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BABA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAMBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.22--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.704.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.900.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.8615.33