Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. HAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and HAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, HAS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAHAS
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedHasbro, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailLeisure Products
Market Capitalization296.47 billion USD11.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and HAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. HAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAHAS
5-Day Price Return3.63%1.26%
13-Week Price Return2.36%22.08%
26-Week Price Return-1.14%32.58%
52-Week Price Return49.89%21.31%
Month-to-Date Return3.08%7.85%
Year-to-Date Return46.66%44.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.60M1.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume13.48M2.23M
3-Month Volatility34.81%23.76%
Beta0.110.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

13.27%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.27% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

12.99%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.99% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.14%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAHAS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.27%-58.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.19%-9.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.99%-13.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.14%-8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.95%65.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAHAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.551.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.081.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.2313.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.565.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.79%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.79%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAHAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.79%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%63.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

16.04

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 16.04 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.08

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

2.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BABA vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAHAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.04--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.082.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2342.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.7822.38